It is evident that many who consider certain comments 'racist' are specifically referring to comments about non-Europeans (specifically non-Northern Europeans). The most vicious comments are those that are made towards Europeans and especially Northern Europeans.
However, apparently they aren't being racist (insulting comments towards whites are not racist apparently). It is evident from the comments (pasty, ugly, dull, skinny, etc) that the comments are from individuals with deep-seated resentment towards whites. It's not suprising. If Northern Europeans weren't so attractive, they would not be attacked so readily. It merely serves to confirm what many of already know but are too polite to say.
# 292 | Submitted by ? on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 06:16 | Anónimo, your list of racist
Submitted by :-) on 06/23/2011 - 12:38:
"The 'real deal' is as has always been in the past Dark, rich, powerfull, dangerous,full of substance, full of life, strength, lustrous rich Black Hair. But for some europeans the 'real deal' in there world is the lifeless, light, colourless, no substance, weak, pale, no strength, no vigour blonde hair. Men prefer danger. You are right the real deal is often unavailable."
Truly, the amount of racial bigotry and ignorance exemplified by some of the commentators here is astounding
Nothing racist in the above comment. Nothing racist in pointing out the the Beauty of Black hair over Blonde. Erik himself more or less hints at this too in one of his comments where he points out that the model appeals to him more with black hair than blonde. As for the rest of the comments there not mine.
Anónimo, your list of racist comments is incomplete. Here are some more:
Submitted by Reality check on 06/13/2011 - 9:33:
''To be honest, there's something "off" with how these Nordic women look:
-Pasty pale (look kinda sick and not normal and not AS sexy and sensual skin tone compared to other race of womne wiht nice fair and tan skin; some of these women posted look kinda freaks or vampires, to be frank)
-facial shape not so good (look closely at the shape the outline of the head)
-the facial/body features and skin not perky/tight/uplifted nor well-defined quite droopy if you know what i mean (with that they look quite aged not youthful and that's how the features/skin of other races look like when they reach their 30's)
-the low cheekbone also gives them a not perky look.
-the nose of several women are not finely shaped and quite "fleshy" at the tip.
-extremely thin eyebrows is ugly, weird, and artificial looking
-freckles is ugly as it makes the skin look dirty not clear or flawless
-thin, dry, dull, lifeless, not shiny, weak, unhealthy, ugly looking hair. That's a bad hair day for race of women with great hair.
-skin not very tight, smooth, silky and clear compared to other races. you can see lines/wrinkles in some areas esp. on the neck.
-The breasts are not round shape and perky, droopy.
-the bodies are not very shapely, skin and flesh not firm perky looking looks like a body for women in late 20's.
-Most Nordics too have pancake ass and no hips.
-Many of these women have big and quite bony masculine head- just like the women you posted.
-Most Nordics age fast. Many men even Nordic men say this that blonde age fast, by the time they reach 25-30 they look 10-15 years older. Their beauty is short term.''
Submitted by :-) on 06/23/2011 - 12:38:
"The 'real deal' is as has always been in the past Dark, rich, powerfull, dangerous,full of substance, full of life, strength, lustrous rich Black Hair. But for some europeans the 'real deal' in there world is the lifeless, light, colourless, no substance, weak, pale, no strength, no vigour blonde hair. Men prefer danger. You are right the real deal is often unavailable."
Submitted by My name is... on 06/14/2011 - 02:59:
"When it comes to comparisons between Whites, i find the olive skin tone of Italians more appealing than the Nordic pasty pale skin. It's normal looking. Why plenty of pale Whites like the Nordics get a tan? Usually they look better with some coloring as their light skin, I'm sorry this sounds harsh but,it looks quite abnormal, freakish, sickly, ghostly or pig-skinned. Just making a point, like you can say Asian eyes are freak alien looking. The natural fair skin of Asians look normal and great tone and quality while the natural tan look very sensual."
Submitted by My name is... on 06/14/2011 - 01:53:
"In medical sense, the light genes of the Europeans are not superior at all, in fact, quite inferior. Read and analyze well my posts above regarding genetics. The idea angels have blue eyes and blonde hair are mere illusion or fantasy has no reality basis. Nobody ever seen an angel, there's no even proof they exist. And the very feminine more delicate Asians are angelic too - from head to toe."
Submittted by My name is... on 06/13/2011 - 11:56:
"Something interesting. This is not to offend but simply providing more information about the differences.
I've read in some Sexuality forum in the past about comparisons of different races of women and the scent in the female private part. Many men testified Asian women have no smell in private part and very clean (nobody said otherwise) while many men have said White women have bad smell down there, some have white mucus around their genitalia, and 3 guys said particulary the blondes and red heads have a distinct bad smell in private part. Could it be just differences of the food they eat and differences in hygiene or it's a genetic differences?"
Submitted by Todd on 04/21/2011 - 07:26:
"average asian female body delicate & feminine
compared with average stocky manly nordic female body:
(in blue & yellow outfit) look how disgusting stocky and pig like she looks. very typical nordic traits:
Yes asian women are superior. The only good looking nordic women are the ones who have asiatic features."
Submitted by James Crow on 06/29/2010 - 21:01:
"Personally, I've never seen Celtic or Nordic peoples to be attractive races. They may have their outliers, but as a whole, both groups are host to many hairy overweight people, probably because it's so cold where they come from. May I add that hirsutism IS one of the defining ethnic traits of many European ethnic groups, and it is definitely not seen as an ideal of attractiveness. Nor are red hair and freckles. It doesn't help that many white people don't age gracefully."
Truly, the amount of racial bigotry and ignorance exemplified by some of the commentators here is astounding.
I'm going to cut and paste some comments of some people here to show the level of racism, because it's incredible for me to read this kind of things after all the horrible things that racism and ignorant racist people has done through centuries.
N° 57: Emily:
"Booty man is probably a borderline fetishist who finds that nothing short of Kim Kardashian's giant backside is sexually stimulating. Men who need that kind of over-stimulation are probably often great consumers of pornography, and therefore become desensitized.
Nordic girls generally have nicely rounded, medium-sized backsides, but not often the giant, violently protruding primate backside seen among blacks and some latin women with black admixture."
N° 58: Barbarella:
"That is what a feminine, softly curving backside should look like, I agree. Whatever has come over men here in the States, maybe it's the whole "ghetto fab" culture, where whites, for whatever reason, are adopting the latin/black "hip-hop" culture, and are exhalting these "fat" asses. Kim Kardashian and Jennifer Lopez style butts are in fashion right now. (...) Of course, their women become incensed with envy and jealousy, because even if countless numbers of hip-hop videos display those kinds of backsides, if the truth be told, their men would really rather admire the type of body/backside that are characteristic of fair, properly proportioned white women."
N° 78: Godis:
"oh wait according to Barberella, a NORTHERN EUROPEAN, I do have the ideal face type. Hmmm... so much for being envious..."
N° 82: Barbarella:
"Kristen Kruek is cute, but beautiful? I don't happen to think so. As a matter of fact, she proves a lot of Emily's arguments here, so why she is always used as an example to disspel Emily's theories is useless. Yes, she looks cute because of her Asian looks, but the refinement of those looks is credited to European admixture!!"
N° 84: Emily:
Kristin Kreuk is overrated. In many candid shots, without the staging and air-brushing, she looks odd, just like so many racially mixed people do.
Her worst traits are her nose, (Probably surgically altered), and her squinting, semi-mongoloid eyes.
She did have a kind of girly cuteness to her, but as she matures that fades and her biracial beauty problems will take over.
Like many race-mixed people her face is identity-less, and there is lack of harmony. She is always put forth as an ideal and that is pathetic. She really is of more use to me, in that I can say that her mongoloid admixture is her great weakness, just like I could in the case of Emma Ward.
An unusually attractive Asian girl - like this Vietnamese girl - is more attractive since there is harmony, balance and racial purity in her face. There are not different forces that clash and fight for dominance in her face. I rarely find Asians good-looking so this girl is indeed part of a very exclusive club.
So, if you think my photos are unattractive it is because ordinary 100% Asians are unattractive, on average. Their round, flat heads, mongoloid features and underdeveloped bodies are simply often very unappealing traits."
N° 91: Emily:
"(...)She is less attractive because she is bi-racial, not because she is slim. Her slimness bring forth her Asian traits more, though."
Emily sure you are a disgusting nazi: racial purity and the way you talk about latin, afro, asian and bi-racial as you call it! Barbarella is quite a nazi too, and Godis well, she has a terrible lack of self steem, why do you need that somebody tell you if you are something or not?
Here's a quote from an editor writing a piece on the fashion industry and the reason the fashion models are emaciated/too thin, etc. In her words:
"Most of the clothing that makes up high-fashion are “outrageously-priced items worn by stick-thin, boobless models with boyish figures who have landed the job because their aesthetics appealed to some gay man somewhere who has no physical use for a woman other than as a walking hanger.” At least that’s the way Tracey Egan, editor of Jezebel.com, feels about the subject as quoted in her recent Vice magazine write up on why she hates fashion.
"And again to quote the article
Last time I checked size two is not the normal woman. Gay designers don’t care about your weight issues, your insecurities, and your self destructive desire to fit their mold. Why else would so many gay male designers be opposed to the idea of enlisting a weight requirement on the runway? If they actually cared about women, wouldn’t they be the first to jump at the chance to properly represent them in their work? Why don’t they care?
Cause gays are men. And men are idiots."
Sorry, Eric, about the last line): Obviously I DON'T agree that all men are idiots, because some men like you are obviously very intelligent to have the time and trouble to come up with this site, kudos to you, it's a great site and very informative, hope one day it makes a difference and changes the way fashion is run to a healthy alternative where no model has to die to keep her career (there was a 3rd death reported lately online which I read on some blog, but sadly it's becoming common place according to the author and hardly anybody's bothered, so they don't report it elsewhere.) It would also be great to have better appreciation of feminine beauty available in a mainstream outlet to please the general public, men and women.
Here's the link to the article from which the above quote is taken it may interest you and some of your readers especially Brenda, Apollyn, and Hugh Ristik to mention just a few of the very intelligent and insightful readers here who I respect for their objective comments on the subject:
Another interesting article, Eric, that mentions your site also as a reference in a favourable light, talks about how gay fashion designers with their emphasis on wanting a stick unhealthy thin figure have created an unfortunate influence on society as a whole and many girls "puking themselves to death" - author's words- sometimes to create that unhealthy emaciated look without any curves which isn't how many women look like anyway and is unhealty and unnatainable for many vs healthy slim, here's the link:
YOU are the idiot, Anna, if you come to the site and have nothing else to say for yourself, the author is very intelligent and FAR from being an idiot, and neither are the commentators. This site is insightful and thought provoking for anyone interested in a rational discussion of the subject matter at hand, feminine beauty and the reason why it's lacking in the fashion world, etc.
61 | Submitted by ? on Thu, 01/26/2012 - 01:49 | Question -
Question -
''Erik, you've said that Northern Europeans disproportionately have the most feminine looking and also the most masculine looking women.''
Erik never stated that. Erik stated Europeans women are Overall MORE feminine looking not the MOST feminine looking. There is a huge difference between the two statements. Europeans may have a higher percentage of feminine looking women (women classifiable as feminine not taking into consideration how feminine they are on the femininisy scale) though within that percentage of feminine looking women they may have less/least on the 'most' or higher end of the femininity scale but due to having a high percentage overall of women on the femininity scale they may be classifiable as overall more feminine looking comapred to the overall of another culture but not the 'most' feminine looking women. Another culture may have a higher percentage of women on the higher end of the femininity scale than the europeans but due to a smaller percentage of feminine looking women in general on the scale of feminity there overall average on the feminine scale doesnt balance out as good as the europeans would, so there overall average on the femininity scale would not be as high as the europeans though they may still possess a higher percentage of the 'most' feminine looking women than the europeans. Thats is what Erik is stating. He is not and has never stated that european women are the 'most' feminine. In fact alot of what he has stated has not been understood correctly.
You are such an IGNORANT JACKASS that you cannot learn anything at all, much less say Thank You for a lesson.
Go stick your head up you tail end!
D.A.W.
Hello D.A.W. well put my dear fellow? But if your going to correct someone on such a little detail as you have (see above) "go stick you tail end!" is incorrect its "your tail end!" thankyou.
Erik, you've said that Northern Europeans disproportionately have the most feminine looking and also the most masculine looking women. Does this entail that they also disproportionately have the most masculine looking and also the most effeminate looking men?
Of course you find these women inspiring...you are confirming the author's point: high fashion models are not feminine and should not be held up as a standard for feminine beauty.
I suspect these girls look more like you than do feminine women.
Um, Gisele is gorgeous! That girl you've compared her to is so freaking ugly it's unbelievable. Don't be so quick to label people masculine or feminine, it's really unimportant and irrelevant. Who gives a fuck if Gisele is slightly masculine, she's still stunning and a wonderful sight. 'Femininity' isn't relevant. Beauty is. So fuck off with this website ahah.
I'm sorry but what is the problem with the VS models!? I'm transsexual myself and I find it so inspiring for women like them to exist, and they are by far more gorgeous than all these chubby and plain girls you've posted. Beauty is beauty, feminine or not.
Hi, Eric, seems Coco Chanel was in agreement of and aware of your realistic theory about why fashion models are so emaciated/ thin, here is a paragraph from this article on celebrating curvier more healthy women, check it out:
"Coco Chanel put her finger on it when she blamed the trend for androgynous clothes on the emergence of male fashion designers, mostly gay, who dressed women like young boys." Taken from article, here's the link:
Yeah i dont see how she looks nonwhite.I know a lot of white women who can tan that well and have the same kind of hair and everything.Maybe someone should put up a site that shows the feminine beauty of other races.
She is White - mother is Irish, father is French. You were probably looking at the tags on the bottom of her Wikipedia article; those are erroneous and don't match up with her Wiki bio above, or her bio in any other website for that matter.
It is evident that many who consider certain comments 'racist' are specifically referring to comments about non-Europeans (specifically non-Northern Europeans). The most vicious comments are those that are made towards Europeans and especially Northern Europeans.
However, apparently they aren't being racist (insulting comments towards whites are not racist apparently). It is evident from the comments (pasty, ugly, dull, skinny, etc) that the comments are from individuals with deep-seated resentment towards whites. It's not suprising. If Northern Europeans weren't so attractive, they would not be attacked so readily. It merely serves to confirm what many of already know but are too polite to say.
# 292 | Submitted by ? on Wed, 02/01/2012 - 06:16 | Anónimo, your list of racist
Submitted by :-) on 06/23/2011 - 12:38:
"The 'real deal' is as has always been in the past Dark, rich, powerfull, dangerous,full of substance, full of life, strength, lustrous rich Black Hair. But for some europeans the 'real deal' in there world is the lifeless, light, colourless, no substance, weak, pale, no strength, no vigour blonde hair. Men prefer danger. You are right the real deal is often unavailable."
Truly, the amount of racial bigotry and ignorance exemplified by some of the commentators here is astounding
Nothing racist in the above comment. Nothing racist in pointing out the the Beauty of Black hair over Blonde. Erik himself more or less hints at this too in one of his comments where he points out that the model appeals to him more with black hair than blonde. As for the rest of the comments there not mine.
Anónimo, your list of racist comments is incomplete. Here are some more:
Submitted by Reality check on 06/13/2011 - 9:33:
''To be honest, there's something "off" with how these Nordic women look:
-Pasty pale (look kinda sick and not normal and not AS sexy and sensual skin tone compared to other race of womne wiht nice fair and tan skin; some of these women posted look kinda freaks or vampires, to be frank)
-facial shape not so good (look closely at the shape the outline of the head)
-the facial/body features and skin not perky/tight/uplifted nor well-defined quite droopy if you know what i mean (with that they look quite aged not youthful and that's how the features/skin of other races look like when they reach their 30's)
-the low cheekbone also gives them a not perky look.
-the nose of several women are not finely shaped and quite "fleshy" at the tip.
-extremely thin eyebrows is ugly, weird, and artificial looking
-freckles is ugly as it makes the skin look dirty not clear or flawless
-thin, dry, dull, lifeless, not shiny, weak, unhealthy, ugly looking hair. That's a bad hair day for race of women with great hair.
-skin not very tight, smooth, silky and clear compared to other races. you can see lines/wrinkles in some areas esp. on the neck.
-The breasts are not round shape and perky, droopy.
-the bodies are not very shapely, skin and flesh not firm perky looking looks like a body for women in late 20's.
-Most Nordics too have pancake ass and no hips.
-Many of these women have big and quite bony masculine head- just like the women you posted.
-Most Nordics age fast. Many men even Nordic men say this that blonde age fast, by the time they reach 25-30 they look 10-15 years older. Their beauty is short term.''
Submitted by :-) on 06/23/2011 - 12:38:
"The 'real deal' is as has always been in the past Dark, rich, powerfull, dangerous,full of substance, full of life, strength, lustrous rich Black Hair. But for some europeans the 'real deal' in there world is the lifeless, light, colourless, no substance, weak, pale, no strength, no vigour blonde hair. Men prefer danger. You are right the real deal is often unavailable."
Submitted by My name is... on 06/14/2011 - 02:59:
"When it comes to comparisons between Whites, i find the olive skin tone of Italians more appealing than the Nordic pasty pale skin. It's normal looking. Why plenty of pale Whites like the Nordics get a tan? Usually they look better with some coloring as their light skin, I'm sorry this sounds harsh but,it looks quite abnormal, freakish, sickly, ghostly or pig-skinned. Just making a point, like you can say Asian eyes are freak alien looking. The natural fair skin of Asians look normal and great tone and quality while the natural tan look very sensual."
Submitted by My name is... on 06/14/2011 - 01:53:
"In medical sense, the light genes of the Europeans are not superior at all, in fact, quite inferior. Read and analyze well my posts above regarding genetics. The idea angels have blue eyes and blonde hair are mere illusion or fantasy has no reality basis. Nobody ever seen an angel, there's no even proof they exist. And the very feminine more delicate Asians are angelic too - from head to toe."
Submittted by My name is... on 06/13/2011 - 11:56:
"Something interesting. This is not to offend but simply providing more information about the differences.
I've read in some Sexuality forum in the past about comparisons of different races of women and the scent in the female private part. Many men testified Asian women have no smell in private part and very clean (nobody said otherwise) while many men have said White women have bad smell down there, some have white mucus around their genitalia, and 3 guys said particulary the blondes and red heads have a distinct bad smell in private part. Could it be just differences of the food they eat and differences in hygiene or it's a genetic differences?"
Submitted by Todd on 04/21/2011 - 07:26:
"average asian female body delicate & feminine
compared with average stocky manly nordic female body:
(in blue & yellow outfit) look how disgusting stocky and pig like she looks. very typical nordic traits:
Yes asian women are superior. The only good looking nordic women are the ones who have asiatic features."
Submitted by James Crow on 06/29/2010 - 21:01:
"Personally, I've never seen Celtic or Nordic peoples to be attractive races. They may have their outliers, but as a whole, both groups are host to many hairy overweight people, probably because it's so cold where they come from. May I add that hirsutism IS one of the defining ethnic traits of many European ethnic groups, and it is definitely not seen as an ideal of attractiveness. Nor are red hair and freckles. It doesn't help that many white people don't age gracefully."
Truly, the amount of racial bigotry and ignorance exemplified by some of the commentators here is astounding.
I'm going to cut and paste some comments of some people here to show the level of racism, because it's incredible for me to read this kind of things after all the horrible things that racism and ignorant racist people has done through centuries.
N° 57: Emily:
"Booty man is probably a borderline fetishist who finds that nothing short of Kim Kardashian's giant backside is sexually stimulating. Men who need that kind of over-stimulation are probably often great consumers of pornography, and therefore become desensitized.
Nordic girls generally have nicely rounded, medium-sized backsides, but not often the giant, violently protruding primate backside seen among blacks and some latin women with black admixture."
N° 58: Barbarella:
"That is what a feminine, softly curving backside should look like, I agree. Whatever has come over men here in the States, maybe it's the whole "ghetto fab" culture, where whites, for whatever reason, are adopting the latin/black "hip-hop" culture, and are exhalting these "fat" asses. Kim Kardashian and Jennifer Lopez style butts are in fashion right now. (...) Of course, their women become incensed with envy and jealousy, because even if countless numbers of hip-hop videos display those kinds of backsides, if the truth be told, their men would really rather admire the type of body/backside that are characteristic of fair, properly proportioned white women."
N° 78: Godis:
"oh wait according to Barberella, a NORTHERN EUROPEAN, I do have the ideal face type. Hmmm... so much for being envious..."
N° 82: Barbarella:
"Kristen Kruek is cute, but beautiful? I don't happen to think so. As a matter of fact, she proves a lot of Emily's arguments here, so why she is always used as an example to disspel Emily's theories is useless. Yes, she looks cute because of her Asian looks, but the refinement of those looks is credited to European admixture!!"
N° 84: Emily:
Kristin Kreuk is overrated. In many candid shots, without the staging and air-brushing, she looks odd, just like so many racially mixed people do.
Her worst traits are her nose, (Probably surgically altered), and her squinting, semi-mongoloid eyes.
She did have a kind of girly cuteness to her, but as she matures that fades and her biracial beauty problems will take over.
Like many race-mixed people her face is identity-less, and there is lack of harmony. She is always put forth as an ideal and that is pathetic. She really is of more use to me, in that I can say that her mongoloid admixture is her great weakness, just like I could in the case of Emma Ward.
An unusually attractive Asian girl - like this Vietnamese girl - is more attractive since there is harmony, balance and racial purity in her face. There are not different forces that clash and fight for dominance in her face. I rarely find Asians good-looking so this girl is indeed part of a very exclusive club.
So, if you think my photos are unattractive it is because ordinary 100% Asians are unattractive, on average. Their round, flat heads, mongoloid features and underdeveloped bodies are simply often very unappealing traits."
N° 91: Emily:
"(...)She is less attractive because she is bi-racial, not because she is slim. Her slimness bring forth her Asian traits more, though."
Emily sure you are a disgusting nazi: racial purity and the way you talk about latin, afro, asian and bi-racial as you call it! Barbarella is quite a nazi too, and Godis well, she has a terrible lack of self steem, why do you need that somebody tell you if you are something or not?
I think you are gay
http://www.wisegeek.com/why-are-fashion-models-so-thin.htm
Here's a quote from an editor writing a piece on the fashion industry and the reason the fashion models are emaciated/too thin, etc. In her words:
"Most of the clothing that makes up high-fashion are “outrageously-priced items worn by stick-thin, boobless models with boyish figures who have landed the job because their aesthetics appealed to some gay man somewhere who has no physical use for a woman other than as a walking hanger.” At least that’s the way Tracey Egan, editor of Jezebel.com, feels about the subject as quoted in her recent Vice magazine write up on why she hates fashion.
"And again to quote the article
Last time I checked size two is not the normal woman. Gay designers don’t care about your weight issues, your insecurities, and your self destructive desire to fit their mold. Why else would so many gay male designers be opposed to the idea of enlisting a weight requirement on the runway? If they actually cared about women, wouldn’t they be the first to jump at the chance to properly represent them in their work? Why don’t they care?
Cause gays are men. And men are idiots."
Sorry, Eric, about the last line): Obviously I DON'T agree that all men are idiots, because some men like you are obviously very intelligent to have the time and trouble to come up with this site, kudos to you, it's a great site and very informative, hope one day it makes a difference and changes the way fashion is run to a healthy alternative where no model has to die to keep her career (there was a 3rd death reported lately online which I read on some blog, but sadly it's becoming common place according to the author and hardly anybody's bothered, so they don't report it elsewhere.) It would also be great to have better appreciation of feminine beauty available in a mainstream outlet to please the general public, men and women.
Here's the link to the article from which the above quote is taken it may interest you and some of your readers especially Brenda, Apollyn, and Hugh Ristik to mention just a few of the very intelligent and insightful readers here who I respect for their objective comments on the subject:
http://fashionindie.com/stuff-fashion-people-like-21-gay-fashion-designers/
Another interesting article, Eric, that mentions your site also as a reference in a favourable light, talks about how gay fashion designers with their emphasis on wanting a stick unhealthy thin figure have created an unfortunate influence on society as a whole and many girls "puking themselves to death" - author's words- sometimes to create that unhealthy emaciated look without any curves which isn't how many women look like anyway and is unhealty and unnatainable for many vs healthy slim, here's the link:
http://formlessnessx.livejournal.com/25666.html
For those interested check out the article and the disturbing photo
http://fashionspirations.com/2010/04/07/the-effects-of-the-fashion-industry-on-eating-disorders/
Some more interesting articles on the fashion world
www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/2899/
jezebel.com/.../eating-disorders-somehow-still-occur...
YOU are the idiot, Anna, if you come to the site and have nothing else to say for yourself, the author is very intelligent and FAR from being an idiot, and neither are the commentators. This site is insightful and thought provoking for anyone interested in a rational discussion of the subject matter at hand, feminine beauty and the reason why it's lacking in the fashion world, etc.
http://thegrindstone.com/career-management/is-the-fashion-industry-a-gay-mans-world-584/
Erik here are afew articles that may be of interest to you-
http://worstinside.blogspot.com/2010/12/katrina-kaif-once-rejected-because-of.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1251788/Coco-Rocha-Size-6-Vogue-cover-girl-claims-shes-rejected-fat.html
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/tag/skinny-models
http://skinnyvscurvy.com/hot-models/model-karlie-kloss-controversial-vogue-italia-spread.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/13/patrick-strudwick-feminism-gay-fashion-designers
http://www.diet-blog.com/06/skinny_models_telling_it_like_it_is.php
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-416078/I-liked-models-catwalk-says-Giorgio-Armani.html
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1538631,00.html
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Gay-angle-in-Fashion-is-very-evident-Bhandarkar/376065/
61 | Submitted by ? on Thu, 01/26/2012 - 01:49 | Question -
Question -
''Erik, you've said that Northern Europeans disproportionately have the most feminine looking and also the most masculine looking women.''
Erik never stated that. Erik stated Europeans women are Overall MORE feminine looking not the MOST feminine looking. There is a huge difference between the two statements. Europeans may have a higher percentage of feminine looking women (women classifiable as feminine not taking into consideration how feminine they are on the femininisy scale) though within that percentage of feminine looking women they may have less/least on the 'most' or higher end of the femininity scale but due to having a high percentage overall of women on the femininity scale they may be classifiable as overall more feminine looking comapred to the overall of another culture but not the 'most' feminine looking women. Another culture may have a higher percentage of women on the higher end of the femininity scale than the europeans but due to a smaller percentage of feminine looking women in general on the scale of feminity there overall average on the feminine scale doesnt balance out as good as the europeans would, so there overall average on the femininity scale would not be as high as the europeans though they may still possess a higher percentage of the 'most' feminine looking women than the europeans. Thats is what Erik is stating. He is not and has never stated that european women are the 'most' feminine. In fact alot of what he has stated has not been understood correctly.
Thank you, but you need to learn what trivial typographical errors are...
In English, "breasts" vs. "breast" is NOT a trivial error.
You people are pathetic coming here to fight
Nice pics, Eric, keep up the good work
You are such an IGNORANT JACKASS that you cannot learn anything at all, much less say Thank You for a lesson.
Go stick your head up you tail end!
D.A.W.
Hello D.A.W. well put my dear fellow? But if your going to correct someone on such a little detail as you have (see above) "go stick you tail end!" is incorrect its "your tail end!" thankyou.
Question -
Erik, you've said that Northern Europeans disproportionately have the most feminine looking and also the most masculine looking women. Does this entail that they also disproportionately have the most masculine looking and also the most effeminate looking men?
Of course you find these women inspiring...you are confirming the author's point: high fashion models are not feminine and should not be held up as a standard for feminine beauty.
I suspect these girls look more like you than do feminine women.
Um, Gisele is gorgeous! That girl you've compared her to is so freaking ugly it's unbelievable. Don't be so quick to label people masculine or feminine, it's really unimportant and irrelevant. Who gives a fuck if Gisele is slightly masculine, she's still stunning and a wonderful sight. 'Femininity' isn't relevant. Beauty is. So fuck off with this website ahah.
I'm sorry but what is the problem with the VS models!? I'm transsexual myself and I find it so inspiring for women like them to exist, and they are by far more gorgeous than all these chubby and plain girls you've posted. Beauty is beauty, feminine or not.
Hi, Eric, seems Coco Chanel was in agreement of and aware of your realistic theory about why fashion models are so emaciated/ thin, here is a paragraph from this article on celebrating curvier more healthy women, check it out:
"Coco Chanel put her finger on it when she blamed the trend for androgynous clothes on the emergence of male fashion designers, mostly gay, who dressed women like young boys." Taken from article, here's the link:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2037493/Like-Christina-Hendricks-I-ALWAYS-dress-impress-men--women.html
Yeah i dont see how she looks nonwhite.I know a lot of white women who can tan that well and have the same kind of hair and everything.Maybe someone should put up a site that shows the feminine beauty of other races.
She is White - mother is Irish, father is French. You were probably looking at the tags on the bottom of her Wikipedia article; those are erroneous and don't match up with her Wiki bio above, or her bio in any other website for that matter.
Great site/ blog on too skinny women/ models where the author cites your website, Eric, in a very positive and good light, check it out:
http://the-lovely-marilyn-monroe.popsugar.com/What-Marilyns-REAL-size-Models-today-VS-Marilyn-Monroe-144140
Pages