Bron : Sorry bron, um....I mean their cloth, heir face are looked dirty , but if u look carefully, they are looked quite like european, when without the reddish tann skin of the sun and dirty cloth they wearing.
Peter Z sounds like a behavioral economist who seems to assign value to every human action. A few points -
1. Just because women do something, it does not imply that women have that innate character in them. You have apparently not lived as a woman since childhood to understand the social influences on women that result in the choices that women make as adults. In the absence of that social programming, the choices that women make are different.
2. Your statement "there never has been a matriarchal society in all of human history and no such thing is possible" is completely false. Even today, several matriarchial societies exist. For example - the Mosuo in China, the Spanish speaking areas of the Sahara, the state of Kerala in India, etc. In fact, these matriarchial societies tend to be the most progressive in the respective areas. In India, where the average literacy rate is 60%, the matriarchial society of Kerala has a 100% literacy rate.
3. You do not need to look at elephant seals. Look at your primate cousins - bonobos. Bonobos have a matriarchial society. They live a peaceful life. Chimpanzees are strictly patriarchial. The female chimpanzees are abused and raped every day, babies are killed, and chimpanzee society is several times more violent than human society.
My points have nothing to do with feminist writings. I am trying to tell you, and other readers (assuming you do not delete my post) that your post has a very narrow world view.
In human society, men and women are supposed to work together to make progress. As evidenced by the progress of societies in which women have a greater role (eg. western societies) and the lack of progress in societies in which women are subjugated (eg. many Islamic coutnries), the role of women is important. That is not to say that the role of men is unimportant. This is not a battle (unlike what some silly people refer to as the battle of the sexes). It is meant to be a collaborative effort. Without a collaborative effort by parents, human babies would have significantly reduced chance of survival. Chimpanzees rarely live up to age 40 in the wild. Humans only reach the half way point by age 40.
Please give up your battle against women. It is a meaningless struggle that only makes the human species worse off. You are playing a zero-sum game.
I do not understand your motive. What is your overall goal in creating this website? Are you trying to prove something?
Every human being is a mixture of masculinity and feminity. Nobody, and I repeat, nobody, is perfectly masculine or perfectly feminine. That perfect creature would die and early death, and hence it does not exist. You need both testosterone and estrogen for healthy existence.
Some men have more estrogen than the ideal. Some women have more testosterone than ideal. Does their natural hormonal condition, over which they have no control, make them less human?
If such people get certain kinds of jobs, for example modeling, does that hurt you in any way? How does it matter if Gisele Bundchen or any of the models you have listed are more masculine than most women?
In addition, are you homo phobic or transexual phobic? How does it matter if the fashion designers are homosexual or if the models look like transexuals? It is unclear what your purpose and motive are. If your website is meant only meant for analysis, that's a good thing, but then you have to keep your "opinions" beyond the data to yourself.
I observe that you have a serve lack of understanding towards the human condition. It doesn't matter how anybody looks. You seriously have no control over it.
If you are trying to claim that women are getting surgeries inspired by the fashion models, that is a logical fallacy. Read the magazines that women read, from when they are age 5-10 through age 45-50. You'll know who is the culprit - men, corporations, marketing methods, etc. Learn more about Edward Bernays and his gift to the people who control your life.
Think about it this way - if every woman were completely happy with her body and with her clothes and with her life, would she buy anything, would she try to stay in shape, would she wear makeup? The economic engine that pays you your monthly income depends on people trying to become whatever they are not. A world full of happy people would be of no use to any money-making machine.
Women are the easiest targets, starting from their childhood. The world makes us feel incomplete without certain things in life. The cute dolls, the beautiful earrings, the nice dresses, the way a teen movie star wears her makeup, the hairstyle of a teen pop star, the magazines that proclaim which model is rated highest by men, the TV shows that depict men's preference for model-like women, etc.
This is the result of the same system to which you belong. Do not blame women with masculinized bodies for the insecurities of the common women. We are all to be blamed for it. The masculinized women have more insecurities than every other woman. If it were not for their modeling jobs, they would have nothing else to look forward to in life.
- by a normal woman who personally knows masculinized women and understands the mental trauma they go through for not being feminine
Jerry Springer, yeah, thanx for clearing it up for me, I knew there was something about you , hellish....that's why you are void of elementary nurture.
Was that your wimpy attempt to insult me? Yaaaawn, come on you can do better than that.
NOOO, I couldn't. You are master of self abasement. AND THAT PISSES YOU OFF.
SO FAR WE ALL KNOW THAT YOU ARE AS IT FOLLOWS:
AT LEAST SOME TRASHY NONBLONDE WHO HAS DILDOS ON EVERY ORIFICE OF HER BODY.
SORDID STINKING, FAT OBESE SMELLY PIECE OF TURD OF A (WO)MAN? FREAK? FROM JERRY SPRINGER!
Of COURSE women have to wear makeup because of social pressure.
There is no external pressure coming from men for women to wear make-up. Women choose to wear make-up so that they can out-compete their female peers in the competition for male partners and male attention. Make-up elevates women's facial attractiveness giving them a competitive advantage.
Quote:
How you can get that this is anything other than socialized consciousness that women who are prettier and younger are better is beyond me.
How can you make this assertion without any evidence? There is a universal human preference for youth (look here for example). We are also programmed by our evolutionary past to follow the heuristic that unattractive things are are bad (look here and here for example).
There is no evidence that the hetersosexual male preference for young and pretty women is a social construction and there is ample evidence that this preference has a biological basis and is universal.
Quote:
It’s attitudes like this that drive women daily to get botox shots and face lifts. Women choose to wear makeup not because they enjoy wasting half an hour a day and untold amounts of money on that stuff but because it’s *expected* of them. If it wasn’t expected, they likely wouldn’t do it.
This is an elaborate self-deception. Women follow a mating strategy of hypergamy, i.e. they pursue those men with the highest social status and the best physical appearance. The emphasis on looks versus status shifts to some degree depending on whether the sought partner is short-term or long-term but nevertheless women are essentially hypergamic in their mating strategy. Given that there are many women competing for a comparatively small amount of preferred men, women will do what they can to increase their competitive advantage. Tactically this includes wearing make-up, hairstyling, fashion, plastic and cosmetic surgery, weight loss dieting, exercising and denigrating their competitiion. Once a long-term partner is found the strategy has the aim of mate retention
(look here for evidence).
Women do what they do to gain a competitive advantage over other women. The beauty industry is driven by women and their hypergamic mating strategy.
Quote:
Goddess knows I avoid makeup at all costs. The only time I wear it is for interviews, because if I don’t, no matter how qualified I am, I don’t get callbacks. If I wear makeup, I get callbacks on almost all interviews. The only variable is makeup...hair, dress, everything else the same.
Women have a cheap and easy way of improving their facial appearance via make-up. Men have no such option yet they too are also subjected to the universal, i.e. cross-cultural, preference for attractive faces and the halo effect (look here, here and, here)
Quote:
*rolls eyes* Wake up and smell the patriarchy, hon.
Patriarchy has nothing to do with it. Ugly men get a rougher deal than ugly women. Not only do ugly men have to contend with the halo effect, the high valuation of facial beauty in mate selection, the general preference for beauty over ugliness, the heuristic that ugly things are bad things -- just like ugly women do -- but men are also subjected to the hypergamic mating strategy of women. Further, ugly men also have to put up with the bullshit from misguided people like you crapping endlessly and at the slightest provocation about patriarchy and its evils and how hard women have it.
Regarding patriarchy, there never has been a matriarchal society in all of human history and no such thing is possible. Not even the smallest, most primitive forms of social organisation (eg. the late paleolithic age tribe) can survive such a social structure and this is because of the hypergamic mating strategy of women. Hypergamy -- unrestrained by culture or worse still encouraged by it -- leads to a social structure like that of elephant seals. That is to say, a polygynous culture in which only a minority of men ever find a mate, the majority of women compete for this minority of prized men and the prized men have multiple female partners. A successful society can't be built upon population in which a substantial proportion of men (or women)will have their basic (bilogical) needs unfulfilled.
You need to wake up and read more widely that popular feminist literature and Dianic tradition nonsense.
MOngol central asian childrens, I'll call them eurasian when their face tend to look more like european. the thing that make them turn to caucasian that's they have more double eyelids than ordinary mongol-central asia, because the influence of middle eastherner.
They may look dirty? without the tanned red skin from the sun of dessert, they'd look completely like northern european people, because of light hair, light eyes, freakles and small nose.
Bron : go find mildstone documentary to watch okay? but mongol-azari I do not say they look completely like european? but I SAID IF THEY MIXTED RACE WITH MIDDLE EASTHERNER, THEY WILL LOOK LIKE EUROPEAN. I GOT THE PIC, LET'S SEE NEXT TIME, THE PIC OF THEI CHILDREM BETWEEN MONGOL-AZARI AND MIDDLE EASTHERNER.
OH, LAPSUS CALAMI!!!! IT SHOULD READ "INBRED NONEURO TRASH"
DERIVING FROM MY PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS, EUROPEANS, OR WHICHEVER WHITE
PEOPLE ARE LEAST INBRED, CONSIDERING GREATEST DIVERSITY IN HAIR AND EYE
COLOR, BUT ALSO FACIALLY, THEY DON'T LOOK SO ALIKE
YOU LEWD, SWEATY, STENCHY PEDOPHILE; YOU JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH AND
BEG
FOR "MORE MORE MORE" PHOTOS OF OH SO "CUTE CHILDREN". EMETIC SLIMY SCUM.
I am WOMAN and don't like robust frame, defined features, but neither do I like children's flat noses and cheeks that are not yet horizontaly prominent. Nor close set eyes.
Of COURSE women have to wear makeup because of social pressure. How you can get that this is anything other than socialized consciousness that women who are prettier and younger are better is beyond me. It's attitudes like this that drive women daily to get botox shots and face lifts. Women choose to wear makeup not because they enjoy wasting half an hour a day and untold amounts of money on that stuff but because it's *expected* of them. If it wasn't expected, they likely wouldn't do it. Goddess knows I avoid makeup at all costs. The only time I wear it is for interviews, because if I don't, no matter how qualified I am, I don't get callbacks. If I wear makeup, I get callbacks on almost all interviews. The only variable is makeup...hair, dress, everything else the same.
*rolls eyes* Wake up and smell the patriarchy, hon.
Nordic european are the mixture of Mongol-central asia and middle eastherner and that's why the nordic have small nose, some even have piggy nose tip, deepset small eyes and smaller body.
ORIGINAL caucasian people have downward nose’s tip, the nose quite big, deepset big round eyes, double eyelids and slender tall structure. the appearance of nordic women that erik showed are not common among ordinary nordic women that I seen everydays.
The example of the picture Mongol-central asia mother who has her son looks like nordic european boy.
If he has much influence of mongol-central asia, the boy'd grow up to look like this pic. ( quite like russian)
On the contrary if he has much influence of middle eastherner, he'd look like the boys in the pic below.
The childrens of village in central asia, where all people are mixted of Middle eastherner, mongol-central asia, the childrens are tend to look like cauacasian.
Hannah : Indeed, the european looking non-white people are rare to find, but u could see much ( much of them) are in the countries around central asia, where has dessert and cold weather in same time, tundra field. where the forest are not much, dry cold or dry hot weather. people tend to have narrow face, light hair and light eyes. the beautifull cerebraties I have posted above the section middle easthern and mongol central asia could produce white race. those middle easthener cerebraties above, with light eyes live in lebanon, palestine, kashmir, pakistan and afghanistan.
but also have some people seen light eyes and light hair arabs in yemen, morocco and Iraq. but quite rare to find in Iran, saudi arabia.
about mongol- central asian with narrow face, light eyes and light hair, almost are living in central asia such as kyzgystan, tajikistan, uzbekistan and turkmanistan. And some in the west of china ( Xinjing). For the light eyes mongol in china, their skin are not that white and have blond hair like in mongol-azari in central asia. you can not find white skin and light eyed asian people in far east asia countries. I do not have any intention to put the topic about racist up, that those central asia and middle easterner with light hair and light eyes are better than ordinary asian people. Personally I like dark hair very much as same as dark eyes. It looks healthy and ordinary classic. But those whom carring light eyes and light hair are also exotic to look. ( but I do not wish it on me)
I find all human, caucasian, middle eastherner , asia and black people are all relatives. We got different looking because the geography of the countries we are living. And it’s nice to know the story we don’t know? about our relative in the other side of the world? that people are not often know about them, or even do not know how they look like.
Mum, InBredWhiteTrailerTrash : I find this site is only the biases of Erik. I do not againt him about all women on this site are looked just fine, as same as the black women, far east asian women or arabs. I try to put this artical up to let erik see that every races are relate to each other. I know erik intention, I have ever heard him mentioned on the racist websit, he said the white people with blond hair will be disappeared from this world in 200 years. Because all caucasian like to get marry with asian, black, hispanic etc. I do not mind if he wanted to preserve his race, he could do that or even make this websit to promote white beauty? But I don’t like that he insults the other races are underdeveloped. Because we are all know where white people comes from? Middle eastherner and Mongol- central asian.
De wanderer :
May I ask u some question? If u were black guy what’d u going to do? When some white guy mentioned u the same way u mentioned adriana lima, heifa wehby and a lot of non- white supermodel about their disproportion?
The first link u sent me, I do not like both, the black people makes board to say bad to the white nor the white makes board to say bad about black.
To everyone : Have anyone on hear ever observe? Why all nordic models of erik seems to have gracil face, small nose ( even sometime appeared like pig snout) deepset small eyes and very weak bone? That because they have the features’ mixturing of Mongol
Mongol azari with blond hair or (Central asian)
Central asian
Mongol Central asian
Comparison of Arab girl, european girl and Mogol Central asia
Again u could observe, the features of middle eastherner and mongol- azari in european girl's face.
Comparison of the shape. arab, nordic european and Mongol-azari.
And I did take a look into the site u gave me, de wanderer. those people in those board are amazing, they have light eyes and light hair though, but their face stil can not be verify as nordic?
You're seriously misguided, this is NOT a "nordicist" site.
You are giving way too much importance to secondary traits as skin, eyes and hair color, those matters are rarely addressed here. You clearly haven't read enough of this site before jumping to conclusions.
Stop knocking down that strawman, you're making a fool out of urself.
BTW, your Blue-eyed Supremacism is quite spooky, if you ask me.
It reminds me of Mengele. You need to go through some serious Sensivity Training
Now, GTFO, do your homework, and get back to us when you're done.
I was NOT saying that non-europeans could not have european features, I was saying that the pictures of beautiful women you are posting have caucasian features, and do not look like most non-europeans. When I think of beautiful ethnic women, I think of women like Naiomi Campbell, who is part asian and part black. She does not have light coloring at all.
Or Flawless look like this afghan woman?
OOOpsss....! I posted the wrong one
Bron : Sorry bron, um....I mean their cloth, heir face are looked dirty , but if u look carefully, they are looked quite like european, when without the reddish tann skin of the sun and dirty cloth they wearing.
Peter Z sounds like a behavioral economist who seems to assign value to every human action. A few points -
1. Just because women do something, it does not imply that women have that innate character in them. You have apparently not lived as a woman since childhood to understand the social influences on women that result in the choices that women make as adults. In the absence of that social programming, the choices that women make are different.
2. Your statement "there never has been a matriarchal society in all of human history and no such thing is possible" is completely false. Even today, several matriarchial societies exist. For example - the Mosuo in China, the Spanish speaking areas of the Sahara, the state of Kerala in India, etc. In fact, these matriarchial societies tend to be the most progressive in the respective areas. In India, where the average literacy rate is 60%, the matriarchial society of Kerala has a 100% literacy rate.
3. You do not need to look at elephant seals. Look at your primate cousins - bonobos. Bonobos have a matriarchial society. They live a peaceful life. Chimpanzees are strictly patriarchial. The female chimpanzees are abused and raped every day, babies are killed, and chimpanzee society is several times more violent than human society.
My points have nothing to do with feminist writings. I am trying to tell you, and other readers (assuming you do not delete my post) that your post has a very narrow world view.
In human society, men and women are supposed to work together to make progress. As evidenced by the progress of societies in which women have a greater role (eg. western societies) and the lack of progress in societies in which women are subjugated (eg. many Islamic coutnries), the role of women is important. That is not to say that the role of men is unimportant. This is not a battle (unlike what some silly people refer to as the battle of the sexes). It is meant to be a collaborative effort. Without a collaborative effort by parents, human babies would have significantly reduced chance of survival. Chimpanzees rarely live up to age 40 in the wild. Humans only reach the half way point by age 40.
Please give up your battle against women. It is a meaningless struggle that only makes the human species worse off. You are playing a zero-sum game.
Be mature!
Dear the website owner,
I do not understand your motive. What is your overall goal in creating this website? Are you trying to prove something?
Every human being is a mixture of masculinity and feminity. Nobody, and I repeat, nobody, is perfectly masculine or perfectly feminine. That perfect creature would die and early death, and hence it does not exist. You need both testosterone and estrogen for healthy existence.
Some men have more estrogen than the ideal. Some women have more testosterone than ideal. Does their natural hormonal condition, over which they have no control, make them less human?
If such people get certain kinds of jobs, for example modeling, does that hurt you in any way? How does it matter if Gisele Bundchen or any of the models you have listed are more masculine than most women?
In addition, are you homo phobic or transexual phobic? How does it matter if the fashion designers are homosexual or if the models look like transexuals? It is unclear what your purpose and motive are. If your website is meant only meant for analysis, that's a good thing, but then you have to keep your "opinions" beyond the data to yourself.
I observe that you have a serve lack of understanding towards the human condition. It doesn't matter how anybody looks. You seriously have no control over it.
If you are trying to claim that women are getting surgeries inspired by the fashion models, that is a logical fallacy. Read the magazines that women read, from when they are age 5-10 through age 45-50. You'll know who is the culprit - men, corporations, marketing methods, etc. Learn more about Edward Bernays and his gift to the people who control your life.
Think about it this way - if every woman were completely happy with her body and with her clothes and with her life, would she buy anything, would she try to stay in shape, would she wear makeup? The economic engine that pays you your monthly income depends on people trying to become whatever they are not. A world full of happy people would be of no use to any money-making machine.
Women are the easiest targets, starting from their childhood. The world makes us feel incomplete without certain things in life. The cute dolls, the beautiful earrings, the nice dresses, the way a teen movie star wears her makeup, the hairstyle of a teen pop star, the magazines that proclaim which model is rated highest by men, the TV shows that depict men's preference for model-like women, etc.
This is the result of the same system to which you belong. Do not blame women with masculinized bodies for the insecurities of the common women. We are all to be blamed for it. The masculinized women have more insecurities than every other woman. If it were not for their modeling jobs, they would have nothing else to look forward to in life.
- by a normal woman who personally knows masculinized women and understands the mental trauma they go through for not being feminine
ONLY A LOWLIFE PAEDOPHILIC GRIMY CREEP LIKE YOU COULD NEIGH SO MUCH FOR THE PHOTOS OF CHILDREN
Oh, well, I squandered sufficient time for you; I still have words in my treasury, mind you. But I really want to forget you, and I am drowsy now.
I should not mingle on blogs with a dirty RACIST PEDOPHILE.
Hey, ILLBRED TRASH I am enjoying it too, you APE
Jerry Springer, yeah, thanx for clearing it up for me, I knew there was something about you , hellish....that's why you are void of elementary nurture.
Was that your wimpy attempt to insult me? Yaaaawn, come on you can do better than that.
NOOO, I couldn't. You are master of self abasement. AND THAT PISSES YOU OFF.
SO FAR WE ALL KNOW THAT YOU ARE AS IT FOLLOWS:
AT LEAST SOME TRASHY NONBLONDE WHO HAS DILDOS ON EVERY ORIFICE OF HER BODY.
SORDID STINKING, FAT OBESE SMELLY PIECE OF TURD OF A (WO)MAN? FREAK? FROM JERRY SPRINGER!
SMELLY INBRED CHAVVY/NONWHITE TRASH/ NONEURO TRASH/ (SUB) URBAN? TRASH, STINKING RACIST PAEDOHPHILIC, XENOPHOBIC HYENA SNOUTED WORM.
See, how we are improving our acquaintance
Jodith: You wrote,
Quote:
There is no external pressure coming from men for women to wear make-up. Women choose to wear make-up so that they can out-compete their female peers in the competition for male partners and male attention. Make-up elevates women's facial attractiveness giving them a competitive advantage.
Quote:
How can you make this assertion without any evidence? There is a universal human preference for youth (look here for example). We are also programmed by our evolutionary past to follow the heuristic that unattractive things are are bad (look here and here for example).
There is no evidence that the hetersosexual male preference for young and pretty women is a social construction and there is ample evidence that this preference has a biological basis and is universal.
Quote:
This is an elaborate self-deception. Women follow a mating strategy of hypergamy, i.e. they pursue those men with the highest social status and the best physical appearance. The emphasis on looks versus status shifts to some degree depending on whether the sought partner is short-term or long-term but nevertheless women are essentially hypergamic in their mating strategy. Given that there are many women competing for a comparatively small amount of preferred men, women will do what they can to increase their competitive advantage. Tactically this includes wearing make-up, hairstyling, fashion, plastic and cosmetic surgery, weight loss dieting, exercising and denigrating their competitiion. Once a long-term partner is found the strategy has the aim of mate retention
(look here for evidence).
Women do what they do to gain a competitive advantage over other women. The beauty industry is driven by women and their hypergamic mating strategy.
Quote:
Women have a cheap and easy way of improving their facial appearance via make-up. Men have no such option yet they too are also subjected to the universal, i.e. cross-cultural, preference for attractive faces and the halo effect (look here, here and,
here)
Quote:
Patriarchy has nothing to do with it. Ugly men get a rougher deal than ugly women. Not only do ugly men have to contend with the halo effect, the high valuation of facial beauty in mate selection, the general preference for beauty over ugliness, the heuristic that ugly things are bad things -- just like ugly women do -- but men are also subjected to the hypergamic mating strategy of women. Further, ugly men also have to put up with the bullshit from misguided people like you crapping endlessly and at the slightest provocation about patriarchy and its evils and how hard women have it.
Regarding patriarchy, there never has been a matriarchal society in all of human history and no such thing is possible. Not even the smallest, most primitive forms of social organisation (eg. the late paleolithic age tribe) can survive such a social structure and this is because of the hypergamic mating strategy of women. Hypergamy -- unrestrained by culture or worse still encouraged by it -- leads to a social structure like that of elephant seals. That is to say, a polygynous culture in which only a minority of men ever find a mate, the majority of women compete for this minority of prized men and the prized men have multiple female partners. A successful society can't be built upon population in which a substantial proportion of men (or women)will have their basic (bilogical) needs unfulfilled.
You need to wake up and read more widely that popular feminist literature and Dianic tradition nonsense.
-Peter Z
HELLO BRON,
Was that your wimpy attempt to insult me? Yaaaawn, come on you can do better than that.
AT LEAST I AM NOT SOME TRASHY BLONDE WHO HAS DILDOS ON EVERY ORIFICE OF HER BODY.
MY DEAR STINKING, FAT OBESE SMELLY PIECE OF TURD OF A WOMAN? FREAK? FROM JERRY SPRINGER!
SMELLY INBRED CHAVVY/ WHITETRASH/ EUROTRASH/ HILLBILLY TRASH, STINKING RACIST PAEDOHPHILIC, XENOPHOBIC PIG SNOUTED WORM.
OINK! OINK!
ONLY A LOWLIFE PAEDOPHILIC SCUM LIKE YOU COULD PICK ON LITTLE CHILDREN AS HAVING HAVING FLAT NOSES OR LOW CHEEKS.
GET A LIFE!!! AND GET OVER IT!!!
hehehe this is fun, I am enjoying this.
Muah, muah, muah.
Love to bron from your stinky trailer trash mom.
zonneschijn,
They may look dirty?
Why dirty?? Man, you're funny.
Pretty with light make up like this korean girl?
MOngol central asian childrens, I'll call them eurasian when their face tend to look more like european. the thing that make them turn to caucasian that's they have more double eyelids than ordinary mongol-central asia, because the influence of middle eastherner.
They may look dirty? without the tanned red skin from the sun of dessert, they'd look completely like northern european people, because of light hair, light eyes, freakles and small nose.
Arab girl
Blonded hair arab boy
afghan girl
: last three pictures for de wanderer.
More
Well, I don't know where to look for it :(
http://i274.photobucket.com/albums/jj243/lekkertije/blondama.jpg[/IMG]
Bron : go find mildstone documentary to watch okay? but mongol-azari I do not say they look completely like european? but I SAID IF THEY MIXTED RACE WITH MIDDLE EASTHERNER, THEY WILL LOOK LIKE EUROPEAN. I GOT THE PIC, LET'S SEE NEXT TIME, THE PIC OF THEI CHILDREM BETWEEN MONGOL-AZARI AND MIDDLE EASTHERNER.
OH, LAPSUS CALAMI!!!! IT SHOULD READ "INBRED NONEURO TRASH"
DERIVING FROM MY PERSONAL OBSERVATIONS, EUROPEANS, OR WHICHEVER WHITE
PEOPLE ARE LEAST INBRED, CONSIDERING GREATEST DIVERSITY IN HAIR AND EYE
COLOR, BUT ALSO FACIALLY, THEY DON'T LOOK SO ALIKE
Mom / Inbred non Eurotrash
YOU LEWD, SWEATY, STENCHY PEDOPHILE; YOU JUST CAN'T GET ENOUGH AND
BEG
FOR "MORE MORE MORE" PHOTOS OF OH SO "CUTE CHILDREN". EMETIC SLIMY SCUM.
I am WOMAN and don't like robust frame, defined features, but neither do I like children's flat noses and cheeks that are not yet horizontaly prominent. Nor close set eyes.
ery feminine and lovely young Mongol-azari half Middle eastherner.
AAARRRGGGGHHHHHh!
Of COURSE women have to wear makeup because of social pressure. How you can get that this is anything other than socialized consciousness that women who are prettier and younger are better is beyond me. It's attitudes like this that drive women daily to get botox shots and face lifts. Women choose to wear makeup not because they enjoy wasting half an hour a day and untold amounts of money on that stuff but because it's *expected* of them. If it wasn't expected, they likely wouldn't do it. Goddess knows I avoid makeup at all costs. The only time I wear it is for interviews, because if I don't, no matter how qualified I am, I don't get callbacks. If I wear makeup, I get callbacks on almost all interviews. The only variable is makeup...hair, dress, everything else the same.
*rolls eyes* Wake up and smell the patriarchy, hon.
Nordic european are the mixture of Mongol-central asia and middle eastherner and that's why the nordic have small nose, some even have piggy nose tip, deepset small eyes and smaller body.
ORIGINAL caucasian people have downward nose’s tip, the nose quite big, deepset big round eyes, double eyelids and slender tall structure. the appearance of nordic women that erik showed are not common among ordinary nordic women that I seen everydays.
The example of the picture Mongol-central asia mother who has her son looks like nordic european boy.
If he has much influence of mongol-central asia, the boy'd grow up to look like this pic. ( quite like russian)
On the contrary if he has much influence of middle eastherner, he'd look like the boys in the pic below.
The childrens of village in central asia, where all people are mixted of Middle eastherner, mongol-central asia, the childrens are tend to look like cauacasian.
Well Erik alias Bron alias Der wanderer alias Peter Z etc; etc; don't like women with defined features because they threaten him and he is a wimp.
He only likes non threatening women with weak bone structure because they look like children. Disgusting!
Hannah : Indeed, the european looking non-white people are rare to find, but u could see much ( much of them) are in the countries around central asia, where has dessert and cold weather in same time, tundra field. where the forest are not much, dry cold or dry hot weather. people tend to have narrow face, light hair and light eyes. the beautifull cerebraties I have posted above the section middle easthern and mongol central asia could produce white race. those middle easthener cerebraties above, with light eyes live in lebanon, palestine, kashmir, pakistan and afghanistan.
but also have some people seen light eyes and light hair arabs in yemen, morocco and Iraq. but quite rare to find in Iran, saudi arabia.
about mongol- central asian with narrow face, light eyes and light hair, almost are living in central asia such as kyzgystan, tajikistan, uzbekistan and turkmanistan. And some in the west of china ( Xinjing). For the light eyes mongol in china, their skin are not that white and have blond hair like in mongol-azari in central asia. you can not find white skin and light eyed asian people in far east asia countries. I do not have any intention to put the topic about racist up, that those central asia and middle easterner with light hair and light eyes are better than ordinary asian people. Personally I like dark hair very much as same as dark eyes. It looks healthy and ordinary classic. But those whom carring light eyes and light hair are also exotic to look. ( but I do not wish it on me)
I find all human, caucasian, middle eastherner , asia and black people are all relatives. We got different looking because the geography of the countries we are living. And it’s nice to know the story we don’t know? about our relative in the other side of the world? that people are not often know about them, or even do not know how they look like.
Mum, InBredWhiteTrailerTrash : I find this site is only the biases of Erik. I do not againt him about all women on this site are looked just fine, as same as the black women, far east asian women or arabs. I try to put this artical up to let erik see that every races are relate to each other. I know erik intention, I have ever heard him mentioned on the racist websit, he said the white people with blond hair will be disappeared from this world in 200 years. Because all caucasian like to get marry with asian, black, hispanic etc. I do not mind if he wanted to preserve his race, he could do that or even make this websit to promote white beauty? But I don’t like that he insults the other races are underdeveloped. Because we are all know where white people comes from? Middle eastherner and Mongol- central asian.
De wanderer :
May I ask u some question? If u were black guy what’d u going to do? When some white guy mentioned u the same way u mentioned adriana lima, heifa wehby and a lot of non- white supermodel about their disproportion?
The first link u sent me, I do not like both, the black people makes board to say bad to the white nor the white makes board to say bad about black.
To everyone : Have anyone on hear ever observe? Why all nordic models of erik seems to have gracil face, small nose ( even sometime appeared like pig snout) deepset small eyes and very weak bone? That because they have the features’ mixturing of Mongol
Mongol azari with blond hair or (Central asian)
Central asian
Mongol Central asian
Comparison of Arab girl, european girl and Mogol Central asia
Again u could observe, the features of middle eastherner and mongol- azari in european girl's face.
Comparison of the shape. arab, nordic european and Mongol-azari.
Please keep posting the pictures Zoennesijn,
Lovely pictures! Keep them coming. More please.
More, more, more.
Teach them trailer park Euro/Redneck Inbred Trash.
zonneschijn :
Look, mom:
I'm WHITEY too !
http://imgboot.com/images/Lammero/meow.jpg
Sieg MEOW !!! http://www.femininebeauty.info/images/smileys/shade_mad.gif
Oh, my ...
On a more serious note:
You're seriously misguided, this is NOT a "nordicist" site.
You are giving way too much importance to secondary traits as skin, eyes and hair color, those matters are rarely addressed here. You clearly haven't read enough of this site before jumping to conclusions.
Stop knocking down that strawman, you're making a fool out of urself.
BTW, your Blue-eyed Supremacism is quite spooky, if you ask me.
It reminds me of Mengele. You need to go through some serious Sensivity Training
Now, GTFO, do your homework, and get back to us when you're done.
http://imgboot.com/images/Lammero/reuters2.jpg
Thank you !
I was NOT saying that non-europeans could not have european features, I was saying that the pictures of beautiful women you are posting have caucasian features, and do not look like most non-europeans. When I think of beautiful ethnic women, I think of women like Naiomi Campbell, who is part asian and part black. She does not have light coloring at all.
Can u guess which one is Mongol Azari? and which one is european?
The last one, comparing of the Middle eastherner face, european face and Mongol-Azari face.
Pages