You also believe it hilarious that I believe a Royal family to be ethnically the same. Yes, in fact many royal families interbreeded to preserve the bloodline. This was also a high occurence in GERMANY! Oh my! Actually, there area where my ancestors are from had a retarded king because of the interbreeding. So if royalty went as far as to interbreed, I think it was a safe bet to say that they at least kept themselves ethnically the same. The girls appear Slavic, obviousls because THEY ARE!
The Romanov children appear very Slavic. Slavs themselves have a high percentage of Nordic genes, even in the South where the celts and Goths and all of them invaded. I thought you believed the British to be generally ugly? Hmm... contradicting yourself much?
Also, is that the best you can do Emily? Identify the Romanovs as something else besides Slavic? What about all my other arguments?
The Miss USA pageant isn't based on femininity, it's based on beauty. Tara Conner has a boyish physique but that doesn't make her unattractive.
Breast implants cheapen her image, but you can't ban cosmetic surgery altogether. Someone could have a broken nose or a car accident.
All women are beautiful for some reason or another, so really beauty pageants are altogether pointless. Tara Conner, Snow, and the anonymous "North American" girl (whatever that means) are all gorgeous.
In a society where "celebutantes" like Paris Hilton dominate newsstands and models who weigh less than 90 pounds die from malnutrition, female body image is one of the more dire problems facing today's society. "America the Beautiful" illuminates the issue by covering every base. Child models, plastic surgery, celebrity worship, airbrushed advertising, dangerous cosmetics - no rock is left unturned.
How much you want to bet that some rocks actually *will* be left unturned by this movie?
Every single man I have ever been intimate has adored my small breasts. I am a rather tiny person, and I would say I have a pretty ideal hourglass shape, and my breasts fit my frame perfectly. If I had C's, I would look disproportionate and also probably fall over because I doubt I could carry the weight. :S
For the record, those women do have "normal" breasts. Not many women have tiny rib cages and waists and huge breasts without enhancing surgery.
I would say that the first girl has small breasts, but a pretty darn small ribcage and waist as well. I would think that her small breasts are giving you the illusion that she has a bigger rib cage than she does, but in reality she has just as small - if not a SMALLER - rib cage as most of the women in your attractive section.
You post the SAME photos of unattractive Indians and Asians. Why always cheerleaders? Extremely proffessional cheerleaders are going to be more masculine. You post up high school photos of Nordic cheerleaders and Olympic photos of Asian cheerleaders. When done proffessionally cheerleading is a vigorous sport, and naturally only more masculine females will be suited for proffessional cheerleading while more feminine women will be suited for high school cheerleading which is less demanding. Your argument is pointless because the photos are biased in that sense.
It's funny how YOU resort to personal attacks when things are not going your way. Why are you bringing pedophiles into this? I provided photos of attractive Asians, that is what you asked for, you got it. Face the facts, the Nordic race is gorgeous but not superior.
The fact that you think Kristin Kreuk is less attractive than the photos of the women YOU posted is LAUGHABLE! Honestly, no one can argue with you because you lie to yourself as well as others. Kristin Kreuk is one of the few people in Hollywood that had not had any cosmetic surgery. Her nose is more attractive than the Nordic norm, HER EYE area makes her MORE attractive than the Nordic eye area because they are far set and wide eyes, her lips are fuller, her face is rounder, softer, and more neotonis. All these features she got from her ASIAN side. And her hair is gorgeous and thick.
Asians and Indians show only professional model photos, never pictures of ordinary people. I wonder why. LOL
And these photos of half-Asian and half-Indian models who have had plastic surgeries are supposed to convince people of what? That Nordics look better, I assume.
The lolita-look of the Asian women is disgusting. Why do Asians so often cater to phedophiles? Because that is the only niche they have. Adult sexy and curvy women make them look like underdeveloped children. They are just one step from looking like this;
Of course this is what Asians really look like outside the studio (Cheerleaders Olympics in Beijing);
EMILY and GODIS
Emily now i think your being really biased...I think Kristin is lovely and i am not sure what you were trying to say about South Asians but here is one of my favorite actresses that looks as good as many Nordics....The hazel eyed Madhuri
Here are some photos of Asians off photobucket. They can "STAND ON THEIR OWN" I have a lot of Asian and Eurasian friends, mainly Chinese, and a lot of them look like this. Even darker ones are attractive. My one friend from Cambodia is really tan but she is gorgeous still.
Again, I can't get population photos because I don't know where to find them:
No, Asian genes do not improve Nordic looks. That is nonsense. My photos of Swedish women here beautifully illustrate this.
Nordic genes, however, ALWAYS improve Asian looks since 100% Asians almost never can compete with Nordics. Don't even go there because it is laughably obvious you have no case. Nordics stand better on their own and more often than not a mixing of genes actually destroy our looks, as I showed in the photo of the half-Asian Swedish woman.
I don't find this model mutt especially attractive. Her remaining mongoloid traits are damaging her looks, especially visible around the upper part of her nose and her eyes, and yellowish skin tone. The lower part of her nose seems out of proportion to her upper part in ther last photo, telling me she probably had plastic surgery.
I find more beauty in a pure South Asian face than I do in this plastic no-man's-land of a face. As is usually the case with mutts her face lacks identity.
It is obvious that Kristin ASIAN features play a very big part in her attractiveness and give her an edge over most normal Nordic women.
And I would find photos of plain ordinary attractive Asians or Indians or whatever, but I honestly don't know of any websites I can get these photos without exploiting regular everyday people. If you have a website that has photos of populations like this, then please give it to me. However, I honestly don't know where to look. I found photos of many attractive Asians and Nordics on myspace but I feel it is wrong to post them on this website as these people do not deserve to be critiqued on their looks. They are ordinary people trying to socialize and network, they do not have careers in modeling where it is their job to be critiqued on their attractiveness.
Let's compare an Eurasian actress to a well known Nordic one in her younger years of course. Kristin Kreuk and Nicole Kidman:
First of all, Nicole Kidman IS feminine but not as feminine as Kristin Kreuk. However, I think she is stunning and I don't think anyone in this world would argue against that. Her Nordic features make her stunning as well. Her oval face, blue eyes, light hair, her nose.
However, Kristin Kreuk in my opinion is a bit MORE feminine and equally as attractive. Although, she does not have the charisma Nicole has but this is not related to race.
It is not true that everyone needs Nordic genes to be attractive. Like I said, Asian admixture improves BOTH the Asian and Caucasian look on most occasions. Keyword: BOTH! Whichever one it improves more, you can argue, however it improves BOTH!
The fact that Eurasians are on average more attractive is not my opinion, there is a lot of research that is PRO this conclusion. An extremely feminine woman that is 100% Nordic will look better than an Eurasian, just like an extremely feminine Asian woman will look more attractive than a Eurasian.
You also believe it hilarious that I believe a Royal family to be ethnically the same. Yes, in fact many royal families interbreeded to preserve the bloodline. This was also a high occurence in GERMANY! Oh my! Actually, there area where my ancestors are from had a retarded king because of the interbreeding. So if royalty went as far as to interbreed, I think it was a safe bet to say that they at least kept themselves ethnically the same. The girls appear Slavic, obviousls because THEY ARE!
The Romanov children appear very Slavic. Slavs themselves have a high percentage of Nordic genes, even in the South where the celts and Goths and all of them invaded. I thought you believed the British to be generally ugly? Hmm... contradicting yourself much?
Also, is that the best you can do Emily? Identify the Romanovs as something else besides Slavic? What about all my other arguments?
The Miss USA pageant isn't based on femininity, it's based on beauty. Tara Conner has a boyish physique but that doesn't make her unattractive.
Breast implants cheapen her image, but you can't ban cosmetic surgery altogether. Someone could have a broken nose or a car accident.
All women are beautiful for some reason or another, so really beauty pageants are altogether pointless. Tara Conner, Snow, and the anonymous "North American" girl (whatever that means) are all gorgeous.
Erik, have you heard about the upcoming documentary, America The Beautiful?
http://www.americathebeautifuldoc.com/
From IMDB:
In a society where "celebutantes" like Paris Hilton dominate newsstands and models who weigh less than 90 pounds die from malnutrition, female body image is one of the more dire problems facing today's society. "America the Beautiful" illuminates the issue by covering every base. Child models, plastic surgery, celebrity worship, airbrushed advertising, dangerous cosmetics - no rock is left unturned.
How much you want to bet that some rocks actually *will* be left unturned by this movie?
"All the Romanov children were beautiful"
Yes, of course. And the children's mother was German (and her father German and mother British), and the children's paternal grand mother was Danish.
This was a royal family. Did you expect them to be all ethnically Russian? LOL
great, except what most people "find attractive" is also unrealistic and narrow.
lol wat?
Not every man in the world likes big breasts. If you like that, cool, but saying that any man is going to wish for bigger breasts is ridiculous.
Look another ethnicity that is just as attractive as Nordics! Turks:
Hey look Eastern Europeans! Russians:
Just look at the photos of Anastasia Romanov. Slavs are and have been attractive for a very long time:
All the Romanov children were beautiful:
Every single man I have ever been intimate has adored my small breasts. I am a rather tiny person, and I would say I have a pretty ideal hourglass shape, and my breasts fit my frame perfectly. If I had C's, I would look disproportionate and also probably fall over because I doubt I could carry the weight. :S
For the record, those women do have "normal" breasts. Not many women have tiny rib cages and waists and huge breasts without enhancing surgery.
Beauty comes in all shapes and sizes.
I would say that the first girl has small breasts, but a pretty darn small ribcage and waist as well. I would think that her small breasts are giving you the illusion that she has a bigger rib cage than she does, but in reality she has just as small - if not a SMALLER - rib cage as most of the women in your attractive section.
You post the SAME photos of unattractive Indians and Asians. Why always cheerleaders? Extremely proffessional cheerleaders are going to be more masculine. You post up high school photos of Nordic cheerleaders and Olympic photos of Asian cheerleaders. When done proffessionally cheerleading is a vigorous sport, and naturally only more masculine females will be suited for proffessional cheerleading while more feminine women will be suited for high school cheerleading which is less demanding. Your argument is pointless because the photos are biased in that sense.
Emily,
It's funny how YOU resort to personal attacks when things are not going your way. Why are you bringing pedophiles into this? I provided photos of attractive Asians, that is what you asked for, you got it. Face the facts, the Nordic race is gorgeous but not superior.
Emily,
The fact that you think Kristin Kreuk is less attractive than the photos of the women YOU posted is LAUGHABLE! Honestly, no one can argue with you because you lie to yourself as well as others. Kristin Kreuk is one of the few people in Hollywood that had not had any cosmetic surgery. Her nose is more attractive than the Nordic norm, HER EYE area makes her MORE attractive than the Nordic eye area because they are far set and wide eyes, her lips are fuller, her face is rounder, softer, and more neotonis. All these features she got from her ASIAN side. And her hair is gorgeous and thick.
Asians and Indians show only professional model photos, never pictures of ordinary people. I wonder why. LOL
And these photos of half-Asian and half-Indian models who have had plastic surgeries are supposed to convince people of what? That Nordics look better, I assume.
The lolita-look of the Asian women is disgusting. Why do Asians so often cater to phedophiles? Because that is the only niche they have. Adult sexy and curvy women make them look like underdeveloped children. They are just one step from looking like this;
Of course this is what Asians really look like outside the studio (Cheerleaders Olympics in Beijing);
Indians;
Madhuri is gorgeous, I agree
Have you ever read Harry Potter? Did you notice that the love interest in the story of a WHITE ENGLISH BOY is Cho an Asian girl?
EMILY and GODIS
Emily now i think your being really biased...I think Kristin is lovely and i am not sure what you were trying to say about South Asians but here is one of my favorite actresses that looks as good as many Nordics....The hazel eyed Madhuri
Here are some photos of Asians off photobucket. They can "STAND ON THEIR OWN" I have a lot of Asian and Eurasian friends, mainly Chinese, and a lot of them look like this. Even darker ones are attractive. My one friend from Cambodia is really tan but she is gorgeous still.
Again, I can't get population photos because I don't know where to find them:
No, Asian genes do not improve Nordic looks. That is nonsense. My photos of Swedish women here beautifully illustrate this.
Nordic genes, however, ALWAYS improve Asian looks since 100% Asians almost never can compete with Nordics. Don't even go there because it is laughably obvious you have no case. Nordics stand better on their own and more often than not a mixing of genes actually destroy our looks, as I showed in the photo of the half-Asian Swedish woman.
I don't find this model mutt especially attractive. Her remaining mongoloid traits are damaging her looks, especially visible around the upper part of her nose and her eyes, and yellowish skin tone. The lower part of her nose seems out of proportion to her upper part in ther last photo, telling me she probably had plastic surgery.
I find more beauty in a pure South Asian face than I do in this plastic no-man's-land of a face. As is usually the case with mutts her face lacks identity.
It is obvious that Kristin ASIAN features play a very big part in her attractiveness and give her an edge over most normal Nordic women.
And I would find photos of plain ordinary attractive Asians or Indians or whatever, but I honestly don't know of any websites I can get these photos without exploiting regular everyday people. If you have a website that has photos of populations like this, then please give it to me. However, I honestly don't know where to look. I found photos of many attractive Asians and Nordics on myspace but I feel it is wrong to post them on this website as these people do not deserve to be critiqued on their looks. They are ordinary people trying to socialize and network, they do not have careers in modeling where it is their job to be critiqued on their attractiveness.
I actually agree Erik.
Here is one more pic of Kristin to even it out, I only had 3 of her and 4 of Nicole:
Let's compare an Eurasian actress to a well known Nordic one in her younger years of course. Kristin Kreuk and Nicole Kidman:
First of all, Nicole Kidman IS feminine but not as feminine as Kristin Kreuk. However, I think she is stunning and I don't think anyone in this world would argue against that. Her Nordic features make her stunning as well. Her oval face, blue eyes, light hair, her nose.
However, Kristin Kreuk in my opinion is a bit MORE feminine and equally as attractive. Although, she does not have the charisma Nicole has but this is not related to race.
It is not true that everyone needs Nordic genes to be attractive. Like I said, Asian admixture improves BOTH the Asian and Caucasian look on most occasions. Keyword: BOTH! Whichever one it improves more, you can argue, however it improves BOTH!
The fact that Eurasians are on average more attractive is not my opinion, there is a lot of research that is PRO this conclusion. An extremely feminine woman that is 100% Nordic will look better than an Eurasian, just like an extremely feminine Asian woman will look more attractive than a Eurasian.
Pages